Written for CISOs, security architects, and programme leads who are drowning in data but starving for insight.
Chapter 01
The Problem: Why 10,000 Findings Produce Zero Clarity
Most vulnerability management programmes generate enormous volumes of data but can't answer the one question leadership asks: "Are we improving?" This chapter diagnoses the root causes — tool sprawl, no business context, and SLA measurement on raw counts rather than risk reduction.
Chapter 02
The Five Context Dimensions Explained
Risk without context is noise. The five dimensions — Business Unit, Application criticality, Segment topology, Regulatory obligation, and Threat actor relevance — are the lens through which any finding must be filtered before it carries a meaningful severity score.
Chapter 03
The SROS Architecture: How Klair Vu Connects Everything
A deep-dive into Klair Vu's Segment → Region → OpCo → Segment (SROS) hierarchical model: how it ingests findings from any scanner, maps them to your asset inventory, and surfaces prioritised risk dashboards that reflect your actual business structure — not a flat list of CVEs.
Chapter 04
CTEM Implementation Roadmap
Continuous Threat Exposure Management isn't a product you buy — it's a programme you run. This chapter provides a phased implementation roadmap: baselining your exposure, defining SLA tiers by asset criticality, and building the operational cadences that turn remediation from reactive to systematic.
Chapter 05
Compliance & GRC Automation
How Klair Vu maps findings to frameworks (ISO 27001, NIST CSF, RBI Cybersecurity Framework, SEBI CSCRF, DPDPA) automatically — generating evidence packs, tracking control gaps in real time, and cutting audit preparation time by 73% in documented customer deployments.
Chapter 06
Measuring ROI: Security Programme Effectiveness
Practical metrics for quantifying the value of contextualised risk intelligence: MTTR by criticality tier, compliance readiness scores, analyst productivity multipliers, and a model for presenting security investment to the board as a business outcome — not a cost centre.